Ear magnetic discs to prevent cauliflower ear: a case gone wrong

  1. Wan Wei Ang ,
  2. Gary Foley ,
  3. Juliet Laycock and
  4. Iain McKay-Davies
  1. ENT, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Wan Wei Ang; angwanwei@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:13 Oct 2022
First published:10 Nov 2022
Online issue publication:10 Nov 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

We present a case of pinna pressure necrosis secondary to the use of ear magnetic discs, used in the management of auricular haematoma. A man in his 20s sustained a left auricular haematoma while wrestling. His coach aspirated the haematoma and advised the use of commercially available compression magnets on either side of the pinna to prevent haematoma reaccumulation. 5 days later, he presented to accident and emergency with left ear pain and swelling. Perichondritis was evident on examination and the compression magnets were removed to reveal significant pressure necrosis of the pinna. The skin underlying the placement of magnets (both anteriorly and posteriorly) was black and necrosed, with erosion of the underlying cartilage. In addition to this, the haematoma had reaccumulated in the surrounding pinna. The haematoma was drained via an incision, and pressure dressing applied with dental rolls. The patient was given a course of oral antibiotics to manage the perichondritis. He was reviewed regularly in the ear, nose and throat emergency clinic to monitor wound healing. 3 months later, he was reviewed in the otology clinic; there was persistent helical rim deformity, and delayed cartilage augmentation was advised.

This case highlights the importance of prompt and effective management of auricular haematoma, to prevent long-term deformity. Commercially available pinna magnets for auricular haematoma should be used with caution, and patients should be counselled as such.

Background

An auricular haematoma is defined as a collection of blood underneath the perichondrium of the ear, typically secondary to trauma, seen in those involved in contact sports such as wresting or boxing.1 In a survey of college wrestlers, the incidence was demonstrated to be roughly 52% for wrestlers without headgear versus 26% for those who wore ear protection.2

If auricular haematoma is diagnosed, it should be treated promptly to prevent complications such as long-term pinna deformity, also known as ‘cauliflower ear’. Blood supply to the auricular cartilage comes from the adjacent perichondrium, thus disruption of this plane can cause avascular necrosis of the cartilage. The principle of treatment therefore involves removing the collection of blood (either through direct aspiration or incision and drainage) and restoring blood supply to the pinna cartilage, to prevent long-term deformity.3 Following drainage, it is also important to close the dead space between the perichondrium and underlying cartilage to prevent reaccumulation of blood. Accepted techniques for this include tie-through dressings, pressure dressings, bolsters, silicone splinting, clips or sutures.4 The aim is to achieve evenly distributed pressure across the haematoma site. Ineffective technique may lead to haematoma recurrence, requiring further drainage and increasing the risk of infection.5

Based on the principle of reducing dead space, ear magnetic discs, such as Caulicure or CauliBuds, have been developed as a non-medical tool to prevent cauliflower ear. Once the haematoma is drained, these magnetic discs can be placed across either side of the affected area to prevent refilling of the dead space. Although principally sound, this can lead to excessive pressure on the tissues, resulting in poor wound healing, infection and even necrosis.

Case presentation

A man in his 20s presented to accident and emergency (A&E) with posttrauma left-sided otalgia. He had sustained an injury to his left ear during a training wrestling match 1 week earlier. His coach diagnosed auricular haematoma and aspirated the swelling. He provided the patient with a pair of magnetic discs to be placed over the swelling site, to prevent haematoma reaccumulation. This method is used commonly by wrestlers, and the patient did not seek medical attention at the time of injury.

The patient continued using the magnetic discs across the wound site for 5 consecutive days, as advised by the manufacturers. On day 5, he removed the magnets and noticed reaccumulation of haematoma, which he attempted to aspirate multiple times using a needle. As the aspiration attempts were not successful, he decided to attend A&E. Other than otalgia, the patient was asymptomatic on systemic review. He had no relevant medical history and took no regular medications. On examination of the ear, there was a circular, well-demarcated area of skin necrosis on the scaphoid fossa, underlying the area of magnet placement (figure 1). Anteriorly and posteriorly, the skin was black, avascular and insensate (figure 2). The underlying cartilage had been eroded and there was associated deformity of the antihelix. The rest of the pinna appeared swollen and inflamed, with signs of perichondritis and infection around the sites of repeated needle aspirations. The ear was extremely tender to touch, and the wound was discharging serosanguineous fluid. The infection was localised, and the patient was clinically well otherwise with no signs of sepsis. Bedside observations were normal, with a National Early Warning Score of 0. Blood tests were taken which demonstrated mildly raised inflammatory markers (see below in Results section).

Figure 1

Lateral view of left ear at initial presentation. Well-demarcated, circular skin necrosis observed in the region underlying magnet placement. Sloughy exudate over surrounding tissue.

Figure 2

Posterior view of left ear at initial presentation. Black necrotic region corresponding to magnet placement, the surrounding pinna is red and inflamed.

Anterior pinna drainage via incision in the crease of the helical rim was performed under local anaesthetic using a ring block, which released the blood and exudate. A bolster, using dental rolls placed anteriorly and posteriorly across the wound site, was sutured in place (figure 3). This was done in clinic using sterile techniques. He was prescribed a course of oral antibiotics: 625 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, to be taken three times a day for 7 days. He was reviewed 2 days later in clinic, whereby the pinna oedema and erythema had improved and there was no haematoma reaccumulation. The dental rolls were removed a week later in clinic without complication. A further course of antibiotics was required 2 weeks later as otalgia and erythema increased; 500 mg oral ciprofloxacin two times per day for 7 days was prescribed. Weekly clinical review continued for 2 weeks. The patient was advised to keep the wound clean and dry and to avoid contact sports while it was healing. By day 32 after the initial injury, the wound had begun to heal, with granulation tissue forming around the wound site (figure 4).

Figure 3

Ear with bolster roll sutured in situ after incision and drainage of the haematoma was performed under sterile conditions, by the ear, nose and throat team.

Figure 4

Day 32 post injury. The wound diameter has reduced, with granulation tissue visible at the edges of the wound. Central necrotic tissue remains evident.

Investigations

His blood tests demonstrated inflammatory markers within an acceptable range, with a total white cell count of 7.65 × 109/L (4.00–10.00 × 109/L), neutrophil count of 4.62 × 109/L (2.00–7.00 × 109/L) and C reactive protein level of 5 mg/L (<5 mg/L). No samples were taken for microbiology. The patient had normal observations.

Outcome and follow-up

Three months after initial presentation, the patient was reviewed in a consultant-led otology clinic. The pinna skin had fully healed, with slight purple discolouration. The helical rim had a notable superior notch due to the loss of underlying (necrosed) cartilage (figure 5).

Figure 5

Day 51 post injury. Slight discolouration of the ear pinna at the initial wound site, with a notable superior notch due to the loss of underlying necrosed cartilage.

The patient was concerned about the appearance of his ear and was keen to explore options to improve it. Concealers were advised to cover the skin discolouration, and surgical reconstruction options were discussed. Cartilage augmentation was discussed including the risks and benefits of the procedure, and the patient was keen to proceed. Unfortunately, the patient then moved out of the area and was not followed up further, although he planned to request surgical reconstruction at his new local hospital.

Discussion

Vijendren et al’s study has shown that management of auricular haematoma in operating theatres is associated with a lower recurrence rate of haematoma.5 This is because the haematoma is more likely to be drained adequately with proper equipment in a sterile setting, contributing to lower rates of infection.5 In terms of compression techniques, the study showed that factors influencing reoccurrence of the haematoma included the location of surgical drainage, as well as the affected part of the ear.5 Clinical outcomes for patients who use magnetic discs as a compression technique will therefore vary between patients, depending on the site of their injury. The ear magnetic discs (figure 6) manufacturer websites have recommended usage for about 7 days to reduce risk of reaccumulation of swelling.6 Nonetheless, before patients decide to use these readily available ear magnetic discs, a review with a medical professional may be beneficial. The manufacturers did advise for users to seek medical professional help if the swelling recurred or if the wound was showing signs of infection.

Figure 6

Ear magnetic discs used by patient.

In this case, it appeared that the excessive pressure exerted by the ear magnets had caused tissue necrosis and impeded wound healing. Further to this, his open wound became infected with subsequent spread of the infection to the cartilage, leading to perichondritis. In the management of this patient, the dental roll bolster technique achieved the desired effect of preventing reaccumulation of haematoma, without risking skin necrosis. Additionally, we can adjust the amount of pressure applied by the bolster, via the tightness of our suture. The dental roll bolster also ensures that the patient will return for further review, as the bolster needs to be removed, and we can reassess the ear for any complications.

While compression magnetic discs may be theoretically beneficial in preventing auricular haematoma reaccumulation, they pose a significant risk of pressure necrosis. The case we have presented represents their failure to prevent haematoma recurrence, with an added complication of tissue necrosis and perichondritis. This has implications relating to long-term pinna deformity. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous reports in literature about complications following usage of such compression magnetic discs. The authors would not recommend the use of these devices in preventing auricular haematoma recurrence and advise patients to seek medical attention whenever an injury is sustained to the ear leading to auricular haematoma.

Patient’s perspective

I never expected wearing these ear magnets would damage my ears like this, all I wanted was for my ears to go back looking as normal as possible. I have contacted the company to discuss about the risks of these ear magnets, and am still waiting to hear back!

Learning points

  • Ear magnetic discs should be used with caution, if at all, in the management of auricular haematoma.

  • In this case, use of ear magnetic discs was associated with a risk of pressure necrosis of the pinna and long-term pinna deformity.

  • The authors advise patients to seek medical professional help if auricular haematoma develops secondary to ear injury.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Footnotes

  • Contributors WWA—contributed to writing of manuscript, collection of photos and obtaining consent of patient. GF—contributed to writing of manuscript and collection of photos. JL—contributed to editing of manuscript. IMD—contributed to final editing of manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer